| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus F1A75-V EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120206 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 12 '17 at 02:08 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.8%
Above average
|
46% 71.7 Pts
|
25% 184 Pts
|
11% 184 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.881.0.0
|
4.37%
Terrible
|
4% 5.72 fps
|
4% 5.07 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
56.8%
Above average
|
51% 231 MB/s
|
84% 32.3 MB/s
|
94% 158 MB/s
|
|
|
73.8%
Very good
|
107% 140 MB/s
|
56% 0.55 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.2%
Below average
|
39% 13.5 GB/s
|
20% 6.9 GB/s
|
46% 87.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A75-V EVO Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 12x |
| A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples | 4x |
| Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 6x |
| Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $230 |