Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '17 at 01:18
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 163 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 410 43% 346 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 8469) 3GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.8% Average	Lighting 58.1 Reflection 51.4 Parallax 74.4 47% 61.3 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 49.1 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5443 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3007 (B1) Unknown 97 97 97 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 258 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62416624029	52.4% Above average	Read 231 Write 216 Mixed 223 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 22.2 90% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 22.3 27% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 118%
OCZ VERTEX2 240GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 49GB free Firmware: 1.29 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 104 116375567 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -23837068484535 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3976 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 608 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 129 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 115 104 116375567 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 90688 (EA) Unknown 0 0 37248 (F1) Unknown 0 0 37248 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17664	32.5% Below average	Read 172 Write 90.6 Mixed 102 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 8.33 63% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 8.94 18% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 78%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 270GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 0 (03) Spinup time 151 139 9408 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9839 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11284 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4543 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 635 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 54579 (C2) HDA temperature 122 105 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 198 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 192 0	49.6% Average	Read 90.6 Write 82.2 Mixed 82 64% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.11 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 176GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 180 5775 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12940 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14204 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5691 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 474 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 56889 (C2) HDA temperature 121 109 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 33 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 43	42.1% Average	Read 80.9 Write 65.7 Mixed 72.6 55% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.24 65% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 15.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	604x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	184x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16