Sony VPCF226FM

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sony VPCF226FM (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110905
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '17 at 19:12
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 55.4 1-Core 19.2 2-Core 34.4 27% 36.3 Pts	4-Core 61.2 8-Core 74.5 9% 67.8 Pts	64-Core 97.9 6% 97.9 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sony(104D 9089) 1GB CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.77 Parallax 3.28 3% 3.99 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 4 Splatting 2.87 3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 6357122 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -31928786872547 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3587 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 259 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 38 46 55837589542 (C2) HDA temperature 38 46 55837589542 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6357122 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6357122 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6357122 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7774 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7415 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7415 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5865	42% Average	Read 460 Write 121 Mixed 199 56% 260 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 7.66 52% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 39 DQ Mixed 22.3 18% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 73%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25 4,291 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 60GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 124 Write 25.3 Mixed 82.5 85% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.62 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 1.21 100% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	33.8% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VPCF226FM Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF226FM

CPU
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	20x

GPU
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	20x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	16x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $408

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16