Lenovo 10M3000VUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 10M3000VUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30FD
Memory5 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171023
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 11 '17 at 17:27
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8770E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 103
45% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 166
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30FD) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.512
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 10.2
6% 8.92 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.26
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV256 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 735
Write 285
Mixed 399
104% 473 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 28
129% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 80.3
84% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback