Asus P6T SE

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T SE (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '17 at 07:28
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 149 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 376 42% 328 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.5 3% 3.98 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 3.77 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 97 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 30 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 45 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1686286724	46.8% Average	Read 229 Write 186 Mixed 179 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 16.9 83% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 41 DQ Mixed 18.9 19% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 131 131 34388246965 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 840 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3045 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 509 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 876 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 876 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 249109086236 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	96.6% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 176 Mixed 139 119% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.17 86% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 497GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 116 110 7166 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3516 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15471 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3478 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 103 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 133 133 201997 (C2) HDA temperature 123 93 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	61.5% Good	Read 105 Write 109 Mixed 63.6 69% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.12 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 340GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 127 122 6633 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6218 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20916 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4180 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 131 131 208830 (C2) HDA temperature 121 89 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 80 Mixed 36.9 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.17 70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 133GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 94 83662103 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7258 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 358733904 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 37288 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4768 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 37 504627229 (C2) HDA temperature 29 63 51539607581 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 50 128649274 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	35.2% Below average	Read 56.4 Write 66 Mixed 46.9 42% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.34 78% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.5 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	507x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	225x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	190x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	212x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	139x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16