Compal PCW20

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCompal PCW20  (all builds)
MotherboardCompal PCW20
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '17 at 05:42
Run Duration469 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Memory 43.6
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 22.5
20% 26.1 Pts
4-Core 19.9
8-Core 22.1
3% 21 Pts
64-Core 23.8
2% 23.8 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Compal(14C0 0061) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 336
Write 28.1
Mixed 63.2
30% 142 MB/s
4K Read 5.85
4K Write 9.74
4K Mixed 5.57
21% 7.05 MB/s
DQ Read 10.6
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 4.74
6% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.9
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PCW20 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Compal PCW20

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback