MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131009
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 10 '17 at 23:33
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 564
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 51.1
44% 56 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 70.7
56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 375
Write 335
Mixed 350
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 18
92% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 16.3
41% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 97%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB
14GB free
Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 174
Write 40
Mixed 56.5
20% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 7.2
49% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 58.5
DQ Write 45.6
DQ Mixed 14.3
21% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26%
Great: 51%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
855GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 122
Mixed 115
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 0.24
103% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
718GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 122
Write 91.2
Mixed 100
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.51
118% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 76%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$67
443GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 123
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.26
113% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 99%
hp v165w 8GB
5GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 7.91
Mixed 9.3
14% 13 MB/s
4K Read 5.14
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.004
19% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $657
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback