Lenovo 20BHS1Q500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20BHS1Q500  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BHS1Q500
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '17 at 22:38
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 155
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 378
41% 323 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
Legend(17AA 221E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 6.19
Parallax 7.66
6% 6.91 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 8.17
Splatting 8.87
7% 8.52 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA1102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 506
Write 310
Mixed 427
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 16.1
84% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 46.2
DQ Mixed 47.3
32% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback