User System

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB1
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '17 at 11:48
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90 3,733 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 73.9 44% 65.1 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 139 16% 126 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B 0502) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.6 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 9.88 11% 11.6 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 9.57 Splatting 16.8 10% 12 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6093 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5319 (B1) Unknown 75 75 517 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 46 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 161 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30865152542	38.7% Below average	Read 257 Write 189 Mixed 205 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 11.7 52% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 36.3 DQ Mixed 11.8 14% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 115%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 82GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3900 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1436 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6821 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1371 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 318 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1117 (C2) HDA temperature 115 94 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.2% Average	Read 76.5 Write 77.3 Mixed 71.9 57% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.38 101% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30% Poor	MC Read 13 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16