Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '17 at 05:50
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 207 70% 127 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 649 64% 520 Pts	64-Core 853 53% 853 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.4% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 28.4 Parallax 34.9 30% 33.4 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 34.9 Splatting 33.3 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49 58,154 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	145% Outstanding	Read 1,338 Write 573 Mixed 783 197% 898 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 40.1 151% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 21.5 73% 160 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 157%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220 1,278 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 5TB free Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 23957602 (03) Spinup time 90 87 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1207 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 56324848 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 40 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 29 -3554541524 (BF) G-sense error rate 98 98 5614 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 40 40 120295 (C2) HDA temperature 44 71 73014444076 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 47 23957602 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -122419452835012 (F1) Unknown 100 253 50011618555 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2488627757679	123% Outstanding	Read 235 Write 195 Mixed 150 144% 193 MB/s	4K Read 1.22 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.32 130% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220 1,278 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 5TB free Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 120633977 (03) Spinup time 91 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1631 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 109645344 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 23899 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 108 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 23 -3570991061 (BF) G-sense error rate 97 97 6611 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 25 25 150234 (C2) HDA temperature 43 77 85899345963 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 41 120633977 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -97727685850107 (F1) Unknown 100 253 75992297444 (F2) Unknown 100 253 11997559218072	84.7% Excellent	Read 181 Write 114 Mixed 116 102% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.29 86% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 118%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 196 8975 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1589 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 13085 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 69 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 60 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 361723 (C2) HDA temperature 114 91 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	83.3% Excellent	Read 147 Write 143 Mixed 133 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.94 4K Mixed 0.25 117% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 120 (03) Spinup time 143 143 38684459473 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1042 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1603 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 23 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2078 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2078 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 197569937445 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74.1% Very good	Read 127 Write 131 Mixed 154 104% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.33 89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	79.6% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 28.4 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 22.8 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)