Asus M80CJ-O

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus M80CJ-O (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M80CJ-O
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '17 at 20:55
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	52%
CPU Throttled	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 132 55% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 206 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 873B) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 48% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 697GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0R5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1705 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 70 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 328 (0A) Spinup retry count 101 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 70 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5109 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 236224446497 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 304 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 175 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	24.7% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 33.6 Mixed 49.1 34% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.02 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.02 9% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M80CJ-O Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus M80CJ-O

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	81x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	81x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	19x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	10x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	8x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	44x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	10x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GBG.SKILLBench 42%, 1,345 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16