Asus N75SL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus N75SL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N75SL
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111130
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 09 '17 at 09:39
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 64.3
34% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 86.6
8-Core 88.4
12% 87.5 Pts
64-Core 89.8
6% 89.8 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Asus(1043 212C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 0.81
1% 2.79 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 479
Write 101
Mixed 156
53% 245 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 3.67
31% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 30.7
52% 104 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 99%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
46GB free
Firmware: JE4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 50.6
Write 45.3
Mixed 47
36% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.18
56% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 53%
SD Card 8GB
7GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
7.84% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 16.1
20% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.96
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.51
43% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.84%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.5
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N75SL Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N75SL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback