Sony VPCF13C5E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Sony VPCF13C5E (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	1.4 GB free of 6 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101020
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '17 at 14:34
Run Duration	511 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 90.4 1-Core 61 2-Core 102 56% 84.6 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 210 23% 183 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sony(104D 907A) 1GB CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 3.92 Parallax 2.97 0% 2.43 fps	MRender 4.71 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 2.48 3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MMDPE56G5DXP-0VB 256GB 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7951 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4195 (B2) Unknown 44 44 70 (B3) Unknown 91 91 702 (B4) Unknown 91 91 7234 (B7) Unknown 99 99 5

Ricoh Memory Stick Disk Device 4GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free Firmware: 02 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	6.88% Terrible	Read 8.64 Write 14 Mixed 19.6 11% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.26 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.11 192% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.88% Great: 7%
Generic 00000 SD Card 8GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free Firmware: 1.0 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	9.54% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 10.9 Mixed 14.3 11% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.05 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 256% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.54% Great: 10%
Inateck ASM1153E 2TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 133 Write 98.5 Mixed 92.6 132% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.48 4K Mixed 0.27 97% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 78%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 801GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 27.7 Mixed 25.8 35% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.19 76% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VPCF13C5E Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF13C5E

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	8x
Core i5 M 560Intel $65Bench 41%, 10,722 samples	2x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	10x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
CS900 960GBPNY $48Bench 84%, 5,902 samples	1x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16