Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '17 at 05:42
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 109
57% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 184
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V5900 (FireGL V)
Dell(1028 2B06) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.1.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V)
Dell(1028 240A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.1.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 6.09
6% 7.51 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.22 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 500
Write 437
Mixed 331
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 23.7
105% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 60.8
70% 121 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85%
Great: 116%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 24
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.23
103% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 142
Write 145
Mixed 37.9
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.22
100% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
561GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 126
Write 109
Mixed 75.2
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 3.32
4K Mixed 0.36
144% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
561GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 125
Write 109
Mixed 80.9
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 3.13
4K Mixed 0.37
134% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 114%
Sandisk Ultra 31GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 142
Write 96.9
Mixed 113
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.71
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 1.41
394% 2.78 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $527
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback