Gigabyte GA-M1M3XAP-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M1M3XAP-00  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '17 at 03:46
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5545M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 79.4
42% 64 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 128
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8510G
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 4.91
4% 5.45 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.52
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 mSATA 120GB-$398
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 444
Write 135
Mixed 211
57% 263 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 7.47
39% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.1
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 7.4
8% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback