HP Mini 210-1000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 2.82%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP Mini 210-1000  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3660
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '17 at 02:11
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom N470
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
SC Int 14.3
SC Float 1.6
SC Mixed 7.7
6% 7.87 Pts
QC Int 20.4
QC Float 7
QC Mixed 7.8
3% 11.7 Pts
MC Int 25.7
MC Float 10.8
MC Mixed 15.8
3% 17.4 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB-$56
214GB free
Firmware: 0006HPM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 63.8
Mixed 23.1
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.23
51% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4354323536363441433830302E4D3136464D 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.1% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 1.8
3% 1.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 9%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Mini 210-1000 Builds (Compare 0 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Mini 210-1000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $113
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback