Lenovo 80TJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 26%
Workstation 18%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80TJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5A8
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 08 '17 at 00:43
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
29.2% Poor
SC Int 44.4
SC Float 37.9
SC Mixed 41.6
33% 41.3 Pts
QC Int 166
QC Float 136
QC Mixed 150
34% 151 Pts
MC Int 173
MC Float 134
MC Mixed 145
23% 151 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 31.3
7% 23.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
555GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 84.1
Write 86
Mixed 74.9
61% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.28
80% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80TJ Builds (Compare 687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 19%

System: Lenovo 80TJ

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $170SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback