Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131002
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 23:31
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 129 56% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 400 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 115 Parallax 97.2 88% 107 fps	MRender 99.4 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 117GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5220 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 444 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 50 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1648718182
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 16457152 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 -28973849361366 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3937 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 176 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 63 51543736355 (C2) HDA temperature 35 63 51543736355 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16457152 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16457152 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16457152 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10778 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5389 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5389 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17088	29.9% Poor	Read 139 Write 91.8 Mixed 101 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 7.14 58% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 73.2 DQ Mixed 9.07 18% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 73%
Adata S510 60GB 525 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 12GB free Firmware: 3.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 88 88 7513931 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 -74277164395895 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5850 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 56 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 46 51542622238 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7513931 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7513931 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7513931 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5760 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3389 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3389 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17408	25.9% Poor	Read 180 Write 53 Mixed 77.9 22% 104 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 9.16 48% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 40.6 DQ Write 17.6 DQ Mixed 11.8 13% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 53%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 99GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 93 93 3010 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 10928 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 30228 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9358 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 60 403243032 (C2) HDA temperature 75 59 436797465 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 33238 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	47.5% Average	Read 72.5 Write 92.7 Mixed 78.9 61% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.39 107% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 62%
Seagate ST380817AS 80GB-$130 2,079 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 19GB free Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 56 47 13264762 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8782 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 299229211 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 28672 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7798 (C2) HDA temperature 33 47 38654705697 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 47 13264762 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28.3% Poor	Read 49.5 Write 48.9 Mixed 49.9 37% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.33 81% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 9905403-442.A00LF 9905403-442.A00LF 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.2% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 14 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 11.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	49x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	30x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	5x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	5x
99U5471-039.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 1,536 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16