Asrock H81M-VG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 21:37
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium G3220-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.2% Average
SC Int 88
SC Float 86.2
SC Mixed 87.8
70% 87.3 Pts
QC Int 174
QC Float 174
QC Mixed 180
40% 176 Pts
MC Int 174
MC Float 174
MC Mixed 179
26% 176 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$50
96GB free
Firmware: Q0125A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 496
Write 320
Mixed 355
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 25.9
106% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 14.4
21% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$31
256GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 79.3
Write 81.8
Mixed 76.3
60% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.37
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-VG4 Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback