User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.55%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardAMI Cherry Trail CR
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160314
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 20:59
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.55% Terrible
SC Int 23.8
SC Float 14.5
SC Mixed 14.8
14% 17.7 Pts
QC Int 41.3
QC Float 37
QC Mixed 45.5
9% 41.3 Pts
MC Int 71.5
MC Float 44.1
MC Mixed 60.5
9% 58.7 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.5
1% 4.33 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 5
2% 3.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 064GEA 63GB
12GB free
Firmware: 0.0
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 54%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
24GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 23.2
Mixed 24.9
34% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.98
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.75
78% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 258
16% 258 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $135
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $89G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback