Intel DX58SO

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	INTEL_ DX58SO__
Motherboard	Intel DX58SO (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 19:37
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 94.9 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 152 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 393 41% 331 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1950 Pro 144 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 0762) 256MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.540.0.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 1.44 2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5523 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1584 (B1) Unknown 98 98 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 73 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15360845214	45.9% Average	Read 199 Write 184 Mixed 170 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 18 83% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 51.2 DQ Mixed 18.1 20% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 82 (03) Spinup time 130 130 21505638890 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1321 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2417 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 685 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1321 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1321 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 193274314781 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.9% Very good	Read 124 Write 123 Mixed 12.4 62% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.2 77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 388GB free Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 70748181 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 19249 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 26131960 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10783 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 37 5977 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 73 54 454754331 (C2) HDA temperature 27 46 47244640283 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 23 70748181 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -73512660211427 (F1) Unknown 100 253 632251577 (F2) Unknown 100 253 738387309	49% Average	Read 90.2 Write 80.3 Mixed 35.3 50% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.49 112% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 68%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 31.1 Write 29.1 Mixed 21.7 34% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.25 4K Write 7.58 4K Mixed 3.26 392% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 18.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 57.4 70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DX58SO Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel DX58SO - $246

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	12x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	10x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	12x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	7x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $495

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16