User System

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	. .
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 PRO(P35+ICH9R)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080219
Uptime	20.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 18:55
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 28.4 2-Core 56.3 34% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 113 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300 GS 442 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 1166) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.87 1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1560 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 799 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 44 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 93 93 6064 (EB) Unknown 99 99 27 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7032590624	54.8% Above average	Read 258 Write 205 Mixed 212 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 25.1 100% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 38 DQ Mixed 14.7 16% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 337GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 67 67 10600 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2358 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 6093 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2320 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 85 63 252379151 (C2) HDA temperature 78 62 369819670 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6483 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	42.7% Average	Read 76.2 Write 72.3 Mixed 91.8 61% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.51 115% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 62%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 287GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 156 152 7191 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4965 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9820 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3470 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 232 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4965 (C2) HDA temperature 124 107 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.4% Below average	Read 69.6 Write 67.3 Mixed 62.3 50% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.29 86% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 51%
Samsung M3 Portable 1.5TB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 157GB free, PID 61b4 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 29.2 Mixed 29.4 38% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.32 73% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)