To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 days ago, 3 days ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060910
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 18:50
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Processor model unknown
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
23.2% Poor
SC Int 58.2
SC Float 40.6
SC Mixed 48
39% 48.9 Pts
QC Int 112
QC Float 72.7
QC Mixed 95
21% 93.2 Pts
MC Int 107
MC Float 79.7
MC Mixed 91.7
14% 92.8 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gigabyte(1458 3519) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 11.1
4% 12.3 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 7
5% 10.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$39
252GB free
Firmware: 13.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 59
Write 54.7
Mixed 59.5
44% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$60
209GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 76.2
Write 75.5
Mixed 73.2
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$21
99GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 63.1
Mixed 62.6
47% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.33
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 40%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB
490GB free, PID 6123
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 35.2
Mixed 18
36% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.23
62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 512, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 1,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $69
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback