Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 18:34
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 76.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 226 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 872 78% 661 Pts	64-Core 2,372 147% 2,372 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 282B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 30 Parallax 38.5 27% 33.8 fps	MRender 41.5 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 33.4 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Avago MR9361-8i 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 7.5TB free Firmware: 4.68 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 102% Great: 111%
Avago MR9361-8i 1TB 899GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.68 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Corsair Flash Voyager 32GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.66% Terrible	Read 24 Write 7.33 Mixed 11 15% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.59 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.007 25% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.66% Great: 8%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 28GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 244 Write 184 Mixed 144 230% 191 MB/s	4K Read 9.01 4K Write 9.57 4K Mixed 4.38 508% 7.65 MB/s	DQ Read 10.5 DQ Write 9.77 DQ Mixed 4.45 522% 8.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.7% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 23.3 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 23.7 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	58x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	35x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	21x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	13x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	7x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 102%, 1,063 samples	9x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 112%, 4,962 samples	7x
F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR 64GBUnknownBench 102%, 20 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,030

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16