User System

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation 17%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemJumper EZbook
MotherboardINET P313R
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '17 at 17:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32.7% Below average
SC Int 46.7
SC Float 42.8
SC Mixed 44.1
36% 44.5 Pts
QC Int 184
QC Float 168
QC Mixed 175
40% 176 Pts
MC Int 132
MC Float 131
MC Mixed 136
20% 133 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 4.3
2% 6.1 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 9.2
2% 6.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
NT-128 128GB
89GB free
Firmware: 100 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 444
Write 337
Mixed 180
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 5.19
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 2.54
30% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 53.7
DQ Mixed 6.04
14% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 74%
Generic NCard 62GB
36GB free
Firmware: 4.5
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 82
Write 61.2
Mixed 69.6
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.45
4K Mixed 2.49
557% 3.71 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback