Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150129
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '17 at 11:34
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3650 APU 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 44% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 41.6 2-Core 84.2 45% 68 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 167 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 20.2 18% 19.6 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 23 Splatting 16.7 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 245GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 454 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 187 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 62 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 609906103	80.9% Excellent	Read 464 Write 367 Mixed 256 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 31.9 108% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 59.9 68% 115 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 134%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 116GB free Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4096 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8694 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5111 (AA) Unknown 100 100 2 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 107 (AE) Unknown 100 100 109 (B5) Unknown 100 100 11261436692559 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 119 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	52.6% Above average	Read 455 Write 189 Mixed 227 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 5.27 60% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 7.83 42% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 72%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3443 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1905 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 74 (AE) Unknown 100 100 78 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2584 (B7) Unknown 100 100 643 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 55 193274380322 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 13711851651 (F7) Unknown 100 100 429091252 (F8) Unknown 100 100 249572138	72.3% Very good	Read 476 Write 353 Mixed 361 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 19.2 83% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 26.1 53% 109 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 338GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 92 (03) Spinup time 114 114 17192976585 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7964 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9079 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5134 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7964 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7964 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 223339020320 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.2% Very good	Read 131 Write 135 Mixed 125 98% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.39 98% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.3% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 14 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	16x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	9x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16