| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121022 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 07 '17 at 10:44 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.6%
Very good
|
66% 108 Pts
|
48% 393 Pts
|
30% 493 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43
|
52.5%
Above average
|
53% 64.8 fps
|
52% 64.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.9%
Poor
|
37% 48.3 MB/s
|
112% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
|
60.7%
Good
|
75% 100 MB/s
|
109% 0.89 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.8%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
68% 58.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-970A-UD3 Builds (Compare 501 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 109x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 62x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 46x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |