Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX (all builds)
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '17 at 17:42
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 77.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 996 88% 747 Pts	64-Core 1,716 106% 1,716 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 186 Parallax 168 138% 174 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 167 Splatting 123 112% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 621GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1005 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 599 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 53 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 135 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1916145368	114% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 407 Mixed 411 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 50.1 175% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 136 154% 264 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 598GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1956 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 890 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 175 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5069098019
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1,566 Write 547 Mixed 776 210% 963 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 48.1 190% 76.7 MB/s	DQ Read 503 DQ Write 389 DQ Mixed 175 204% 355 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 144%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 204GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7562 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2283 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 55 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 296 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5533211910	111% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 410 Mixed 421 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 47.3 165% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 127 150% 263 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FBD 4x16GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 54 MC Mixed 33.4 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 9.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 153%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI APEX

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	74x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	60x
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	87x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	22x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	21x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	15x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	12x
F4 DDR4 4000 C17 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 113%, 656 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,065

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16