Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 12:37
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$350
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
SC Int 121
SC Float 123
SC Mixed 121
97% 122 Pts
QC Int 448
QC Float 456
QC Mixed 441
102% 448 Pts
MC Int 806
MC Float 892
MC Mixed 827
126% 842 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$260
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
70% Good
Lighting 223
Reflection 192
Parallax 206
67% 207 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 203
Splatting 157
72% 168 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$191
43GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 368
Mixed 394
94% 426 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 32.4
138% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 90.2
100% 176 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 113%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
35GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 521
Write 328
Mixed 392
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 18.3
111% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 43.9
78% 151 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$63
877GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 164
Write 123
Mixed 140
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.18
56% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$171
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
70.9% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 20.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,140
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback