Lenovo Lenovo YB1-X91F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo Lenovo YB1-X91F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo YB1-X91F
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 07:45
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8550
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 38.4
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 47.4
24% 36.5 Pts
4-Core 92.2
8-Core 90.9
12% 91.6 Pts
64-Core 91.9
6% 91.9 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 2.41
1% 2.37 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung CJNB4R 63GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.7
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
Read 151
Write 91.2
Mixed 83
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 5.49
45% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 4.92
8% 16.6 MB/s
Generic SD128 SD Card 126GB
106GB free
Firmware: 3.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 7.46
Mixed 8.49
12% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.71
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.25
274% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback