Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 00:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 136
2-Core 277
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 782
84% 666 Pts
64-Core 779
48% 779 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3966) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 42.7
41% 47.1 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 44.1
Splatting 39
33% 41 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 426
Write 418
Mixed 431
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 29.1
95% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 76.6
78% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 79%
Great: 75%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,881
Write 1,151
Mixed 1,422
398% 1,818 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 28.3
204% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 28.6
47% 86.7 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 249%
Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
0GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,978
Write 1,450
Mixed 1,534
436% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 30.1
208% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 57.8
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 30.6
97% 195 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 280%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback