Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170323
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '17 at 22:40
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-6600K-$215
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84% Excellent
SC Int 109
SC Float 115
SC Mixed 112
90% 112 Pts
QC Int 433
QC Float 461
QC Mixed 442
101% 445 Pts
MC Int 430
MC Float 459
MC Mixed 446
67% 445 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$304
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Lighting 204
Reflection 159
Parallax 270
70% 211 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 166
Splatting 179
66% 158 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 70%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$86
154GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 499
Write 403
Mixed 418
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 18.1
84% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 101
86% 120 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 117%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
129GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 51.8
Mixed 50.5
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.39
93% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 35%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
43GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 79.9
Write 92.5
Mixed 98.2
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MK5055GSX 500GB
3GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 36.2
Mixed 35.9
47% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.23
40% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$193
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 25.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,115
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback