Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '17 at 18:30
Run Duration	469 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 130 58% 93.5 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 382 38% 307 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 361A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 38 Parallax 50.8 34% 43.6 fps	MRender 53.2 Gravity 48.8 Splatting 35.5 36% 45.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10516 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1488 (B1) Unknown 91 91 313 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 50 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 57712228470	62.9% Good	Read 480 Write 181 Mixed 252 67% 304 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 20.6 97% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 18.8 32% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 988GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 151006480 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2114 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 214921830 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 11017 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1492 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65538 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 521469982 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 24 24 152924 (C2) HDA temperature 30 41 64424509470 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -73589969643495 (F1) Unknown 100 253 23749337779 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2256061653265	83.5% Excellent	Read 146 Write 145 Mixed 157 113% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.22 70% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 114%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 444GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 116 116 25789399340 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2046 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18748 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1646 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2047 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2047 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 184684642335 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	51.7% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 90.6 Mixed 86.5 67% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 64%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 12GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 107 Write 27.9 Mixed 72.3 77% 69 MB/s	4K Read 5.53 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.77 93% 2.56 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 39%
Corsair Voyager GT 3.0 128GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 10GB free, PID 1a09 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 166 Write 124 Mixed 113 164% 134 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.6 90% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 61%
SMI USB DISK 4GB 2,026 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID null Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Read 12.9 Write 4.38 Mixed 3.22 7% 6.84 MB/s	4K Read 4.57 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.006 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 7,967 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.9% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 15 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16