Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5QL PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080826
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '17 at 16:49
Run Duration	652 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150 18,432 User benchmarks, average bench 45% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 46.2 2-Core 91.5 45% 69.7 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% MSI(1462 3050) 2GB CLim: 1102 MHz, MLim: 1522 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 22% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0309 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9275 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2214 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 77 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 3143924646488 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 82 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	42% Average	Read 223 Write 174 Mixed 155 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 5.26 72% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 83.9 DQ Mixed 7.62 20% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 72%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 124GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 8 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3933 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11373 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25779 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6841 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 533 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10839 (C2) HDA temperature 111 99 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.3% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 99.1 Mixed 32.5 53% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.33 88% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 69%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 41GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 171 6100 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17487 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 6 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 48097 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10183 (BE) vendor-specific 58 40 42 (C2) HDA temperature 108 90 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1636 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.2% Poor	Read 50.6 Write 50.6 Mixed 14.2 28% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.47 118% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 35%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 34GB free, PID 00d4 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 2.92 Mixed 2.2 7% 8.19 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0.001 1% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 11%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	7.17% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 3.02 Mixed 5.57 9% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.03 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 1.42 91% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.17% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	43x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	28x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	13x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	132x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	44x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16