Asrock X299 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 130% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170814
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '17 at 12:49
Run Duration	518 Seconds
Run User	MKD-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 83.1 1-Core 140 2-Core 281 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 558 8-Core 1,093 98% 825 Pts	64-Core 1,865 115% 1,865 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 199 Parallax 172 142% 182 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 172 Splatting 125 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 9,880 User benchmarks, average bench 307% 834GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 Max speed: Unknown Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	358% Outstanding	Read 2,536 Write 2,788 Mixed 2,478 582% 2,601 MB/s	4K Read 52.2 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 40.6 204% 76.6 MB/s	DQ Read 584 DQ Write 582 DQ Mixed 32.1 176% 400 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 358% Great: 541%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 493GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	301% Outstanding	Read 2,622 Write 1,786 Mixed 1,909 467% 2,106 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 179 4K Mixed 51.3 240% 94.4 MB/s	DQ Read 54.5 DQ Write 625 DQ Mixed 41.9 121% 241 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 301% Great: 354%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 9GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5877 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 999 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 36 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 233 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5152410150	95.3% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 417 Mixed 429 102% 456 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 28.1 155% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 45.3 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 27.7 34% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 2GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11553 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 337 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 35 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4114471090	93.3% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 416 Mixed 425 101% 454 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 28.4 149% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 43.2 DQ Write 97.2 DQ Mixed 27.5 33% 56 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 133%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 181 181 38681379137 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2759 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5884 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 963 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6679 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6679 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 296353464364 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	71.2% Very good	Read 123 Write 126 Mixed 119 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.53 129% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 498GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 112331016 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8548 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 18538413 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 17689 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2628 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 4295034838 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 40 2904037130271 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1380 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 75 75 50876 (C2) HDA temperature 31 60 -140737488355297 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 194 13580 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -24283745085895 (F1) Unknown 100 253 18326724558 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27207218901	54.5% Above average	Read 102 Write 88.5 Mixed 89.9 70% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.17 56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 96%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 450GB free Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 150 150 34389033389 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2976 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5914 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 961 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7505 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7505 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 249108824096 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	58.4% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 107 Mixed 104 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.43 122% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 99%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB 7,781 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 3.06 Mixed 4.6 7% 6.31 MB/s	4K Read 4.82 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 19% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 23 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 22 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 12 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Taichi Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	42x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	17x
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $167Bench 113%, 31,076 samples	11x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBBench 161%, 2,141 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	49x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $717

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16