Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '17 at 14:52
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 470
52% 410 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.7
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 17.2
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 452
Write 410
Mixed 431
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 21.8
77% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 74.4
95% 172 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 152
Mixed 124
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 114%
Hitachi TOURO Mobile 1TB
384GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 29.3
23% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 57%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
132GB free
Firmware: JF100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 54.6
Mixed 70
47% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.38
90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 42%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
9GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.74% Terrible
Read 30.4
Write 2.97
Mixed 36.4
18% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.33
85% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.74%
Great: 32%
Samsung S2 Portable 1TB
27GB free, PID 1f0a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 35.8
Mixed 29.5
43% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.34
76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G6M1 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C8 16KTF51264AZ-1G6M1 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C8 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback