Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 186 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 359 48% 360 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 79%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 219GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 58 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29756839	73.8% Very good	Read 509 Write 405 Mixed 418 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 18.9 89% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 18.3 22% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB 1,085 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 560 Ti-OEMNvidiaBench 15%, 864 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	7x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U13C9G 4x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 280 samples	19x
HU564403EP0200 4x4GBUnifosaBench 49%, 325 samples	15x
HU524303EP0200 4x2GBUnifosaBench 49%, 508 samples	7x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $306

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16