Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateDec 03 '17 at 00:47
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$345
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
46% Average
SC Int 79.8
SC Float 47.4
SC Mixed 59.5
50% 62.2 Pts
QC Int 311
QC Float 188
QC Mixed 235
56% 244 Pts
MC Int 445
MC Float 274
MC Mixed 340
54% 353 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 33.9
10% 31.1 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 37.3
13% 31.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 14%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SiImage 120GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0000
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.4% Average
Read 273
Write 75.2
Mixed 116
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 7.84
67% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 43.2
61% 116 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 61%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
677GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 148
Write 93.7
Mixed 97.1
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$84
631GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 126
Write 92.8
Mixed 87.1
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.18
90% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA- TR150 240GB
70GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
206% Outstanding
Read 255
Write 181
Mixed 196
258% 211 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 11.3
1,838% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 13.7
2,621% 33.3 MB/s
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$31
13GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 109
Write 70.4
Mixed 53.3
90% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 6.68 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 2000 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $682
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback