Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '17 at 10:08
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	41.1% Average	Memory 49.4 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 25.6 29% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 261 27% 219 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 34 28% 31.6 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 32.3 28% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3171 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1187 (A5) Unknown 100 100 420960404166 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 33 (A8) Unknown 100 100 21 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8 (AE) Unknown 100 100 97 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 44 188979609625 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3461764350758 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1822 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7313 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5861 (F2) Unknown 253 253 10445 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	54.2% Above average	Read 453 Write 296 Mixed 311 78% 353 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 10.9 48% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 32.7 37% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 101%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,729 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 352GB free Firmware: JC4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 111 (03) Spinup time 116 116 25789399341 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5719 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 37 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12635 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5688 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5722 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5722 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 197569282068 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5	31.1% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 46.9 Mixed 43.3 38% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.25 64% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 64%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 630GB free Firmware: GM4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 140 (03) Spinup time 103 103 30089150839 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5588 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 131 131 29 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10994 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3630 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5602 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5602 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 201864183832 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18286	48.6% Average	Read 82.6 Write 86.7 Mixed 87.1 64% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.44 102% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 9905403-439.A00LF 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	20% Very poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.5 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16