Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory30.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 05:34
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GTM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 402
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 40.7
38% 44.4 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 36.2
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 505
Write 406
Mixed 422
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 26.5
105% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 36.1
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 124
80% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 134%
Sandisk SD7SN3Q-512G-1006 512GB
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 379
Write 345
Mixed 344
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 22.6
87% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 14.2
92% 212 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 98%
Corsair Force LS SSD 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SAFC01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 502
Write 475
Mixed 462
107% 479 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 1.98
31% 7.45 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.8% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback