Asus PRIME X299-A

Performance Results


Gaming 121% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X299-A (all builds)
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170808
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '17 at 17:04
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Memory 84.2 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 1,063 99% 827 Pts	64-Core 1,566 97% 1,566 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 3058 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 188 Parallax 170 134% 174 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 168 Splatting 123 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17076 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 308 (B1) Unknown 97 97 59 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 44 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 122 (F1) Unknown 99 99 54571494942	96.5% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 406 Mixed 416 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 27.3 150% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 44.7 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 92.2 91% 137 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 124GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8476 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 140 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 49 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 66 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14388908383	114% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 415 Mixed 422 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 47.4 180% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 127 142% 240 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 81GB free Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 14337373 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 90752658988956 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 604 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 336 (B1) Unknown 0 0 96 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 44 54 1005025886252 (C2) HDA temperature 44 54 1005025886252 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14337373 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14337373 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14337373 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 27425 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12452 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12452 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8319	76.3% Very good	Read 510 Write 147 Mixed 188 61% 281 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 18.3 132% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 50.9 79% 152 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 87%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 55GB free Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,934 Write 901 Mixed 1,105 289% 1,313 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 31.2 203% 82.7 MB/s	DQ Read 50.5 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 194 147% 187 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 243%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 132 132 21494169878 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1006 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 31144 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 729 (C0) Power-off retract count 74 74 31472 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 31472 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 261994053678 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 183 Mixed 156 128% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.22 109% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB 1,121 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 59.2 MC Mixed 29.3 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 10.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X299-A Builds (Compare 1,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	374x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	217x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	192x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	93x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	82x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	49x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	48x

RAM
BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG 4x4GBCrucialBench 82%, 497 samples	53x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	32x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16