Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,371 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 59.7 1-Core 46.4 2-Core 96.1 41% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 399 36% 300 Pts	64-Core 628 39% 628 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00RL Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 452 Write 280 Mixed 267 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 11.1 55% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 99 DQ Mixed 33.3 48% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: AB51 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 134 Write 106 Mixed 97.4 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.25 91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 F721GR65F9333G F721GR65F9333G F721GR65F9333G 32GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.2% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 28.9 86% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	112x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	71x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16