| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Alienware 15 R2 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware 0PRRP7 |
| Memory | 28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170728 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 30 '17 at 23:02 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
|
38.9%
Below average
|
37% 63.4 Pts
|
25% 216 Pts
|
29% 463 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980M
Dell(1028 0708) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
|
43.1%
Average
|
44% 49.7 fps
|
40% 49.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
75.6%
Very good
|
108% 482 MB/s
|
62% 21.4 MB/s
|
55% 122 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
147%
Outstanding
|
269% 1,203 MB/s
|
88% 30.5 MB/s
|
28% 47.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
66.4%
Good
|
73% 25.5 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
27% 147 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 15 R2 Builds (Compare 872 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware 15 R2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples | 629x |
| Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples | 123x |
| Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples | 120x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples | 483x |
| GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples | 172x |
| GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples | 94x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |