| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A88M-G/3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160505 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 30 '17 at 23:00 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
61% 100 Pts
|
29% 226 Pts
|
15% 248 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31
|
69%
Good
|
71% 83.9 fps
|
65% 79.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
92.3%
Outstanding
|
80% 362 MB/s
|
141% 46.5 MB/s
|
72% 119 MB/s
|
|
WD Elements 25A2 750GB
302GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
45.6%
Average
|
117% 91.7 MB/s
|
82% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR3 2133 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.6%
Below average
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
27% 9.3 GB/s
|
48% 83.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A88M-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A88M-G/3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples | 18x |
| A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $889Bench 47%, 6,638 samples | 13x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 19x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $175 |