Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '17 at 11:51
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 749
71% 587 Pts
64-Core 939
58% 939 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 95.5
55% 77.5 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 68
Splatting 58
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,845
Write 1,258
Mixed 1,409
403% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 36.1
155% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 62.8
68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 243%
Great: 236%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
144GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 521
Write 508
Mixed 511
115% 514 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 14
87% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 14.4
43% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 175
Mixed 169
131% 174 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.35
100% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
818GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 168
Mixed 161
129% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.31
89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
779GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 152
Write 117
Mixed 119
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.41
126% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 76%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
332GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 120
Mixed 124
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.93
4K Mixed 0.67
161% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
115GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 40.8
Mixed 37.9
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.26
70% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 34.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 28.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC) Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI HERO (WI-FI AC)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback