Hp-pavilion NQ836AA-ABZ m9652it

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion NQ836AA-ABZ m9652it  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON TRUCKEE
Memory5.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '17 at 22:40
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 69
2-Core 141
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 358
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130
Device(1B0A 9015) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 1.12
3% 3.62 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.78
3% 4.01 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 73.3
Write 60.6
Mixed 36.8
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.43
113% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback