Asus H81M-C/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C/BR (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150309
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '17 at 03:35
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 649 66% 536 Pts	64-Core 631 39% 631 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 085A) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 364.72 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	8.14% Terrible	Lighting 9.47 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 7.78 8% 9.47 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 10.7 9% 11 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.14% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 14934559 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 57475252367210 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 260 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 79 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 48 68722622495 (C2) HDA temperature 31 48 68722622495 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14934559 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14934559 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14934559 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 85899345921 (E9) Unknown 0 0 19362 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11116 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11116 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10025 (F4) Unknown 95 95 10158235	44.1% Average	Read 382 Write 118 Mixed 135 46% 212 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 11.7 62% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 77.7 DQ Write 76.6 DQ Mixed 38.4 40% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 73%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 30GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 136 4083 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 135 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9413 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 127 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 84 (C2) HDA temperature 108 98 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	64.8% Good	Read 120 Write 106 Mixed 12.3 57% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.16 81% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 1,630 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 38GB free, PID 2322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	25% Poor	Read 37.3 Write 36.3 Mixed 3.26 29% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 3.73 4K Mixed 0.36 142% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 48%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 5GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 34.9 Write 11.6 Mixed 5.15 17% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.14 38% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB 866 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C/BR Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C/BR

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	55x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	35x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	26x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	29x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16