Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 (all builds)
Memory	7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110901
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '17 at 21:30
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 98.1 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 184 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 428 47% 370 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PwrHis(1787 201C) 3GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	12.8% Very poor	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 3.38 3% 4.53 fps	MRender 30.9 Gravity 42.1 Splatting 41.3 32% 38.1 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 389GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9961 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2579 (B1) Unknown 96 96 128 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 62 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 533 (EB) Unknown 99 99 323 (F1) Unknown 99 99 67348238483
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 336GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 167 4216 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5070 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16434 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2160 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 236 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14776 (C2) HDA temperature 123 107 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 184GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 130 119 6458 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17646 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 24829 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6251 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 359 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17236 (C2) HDA temperature 122 104 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	21.8% Poor	Read 34.6 Write 40.8 Mixed 39.5 29% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.35 102% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 49%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB 7,915 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 56GB free Firmware: 04.04V06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 182 1850 (04) Start/Stop count 81 81 19197 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 19798 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5393 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1126 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19197 (C2) HDA temperature 119 107 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 37% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.2% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 22.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 15.4 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 45.4 88% 45.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	66x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	59x
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	30x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	78x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $409

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16