Toshiba Satellite C855D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Satellite C855D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	2.3 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '17 at 17:49
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 45.6 1-Core 16 2-Core 30.8 22% 30.8 Pts	4-Core 30.6 8-Core 30.4 4% 30.5 Pts	64-Core 30.9 2% 30.9 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDE6) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50 4,831 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 14 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 93 91 2380 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6504 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16995 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 472 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5647 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3293 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 44 253403725859 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 25 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 2652 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 472 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 59 59 422506	22.8% Poor	Read 39.6 Write 39.5 Mixed 25.2 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.34 76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 47%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	6.21% Terrible	Read 20.1 Write 13.1 Mixed 14.9 19% 16 MB/s	4K Read 1.69 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 8% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.21% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AD73I1A0873EU Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 5GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1600 MHz 1024, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C855D Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C855D

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	24x
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	10x
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 35%, 6,363 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	22x
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7520GAMDBench 2%, 4,996 samples	5x

SSD
S600 120GBHPBench 54%, 1,850 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 60GBSpccBench 52%, 2,308 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 471 samples	3x
TSB1600D3S11ELD/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 304 samples	2x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 4GBElpidaBench 26%, 10 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16