Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '17 at 10:57
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 161 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 502 51% 412 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63% Good	Lighting 78.7 Reflection 80 Parallax 69.3 64% 76 fps	MRender 75.1 Gravity 73.9 Splatting 73.6 61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
R580 240GB 240GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 100GB free Firmware: Q0510A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1309 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 521 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 100 (A3) Unknown 100 100 13 (A4) Unknown 100 100 27056 (A5) Unknown 100 100 17 (A6) Unknown 100 100 12 (A7) Unknown 100 100 14 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1500 (A9) Unknown 100 100 60 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 1539 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 321 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 27782 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 142675 (F2) Unknown 100 100 191083 (F5) Unknown 100 100 101518	72.3% Very good	Read 481 Write 396 Mixed 368 92% 415 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 4.81 79% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 7.53 49% 111 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 83%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 2569 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 824 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3878487983965 (A6) Unknown 100 100 16 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 122 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 28 (AE) Unknown 100 100 411 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 46 231928234019 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2697266201204 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3421 (EA) Unknown 100 100 9592 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5799 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5616 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	39% Below average	Read 400 Write 66.9 Mixed 173 46% 213 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 1.07 61% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 86.2 DQ Mixed 4.22 18% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 78%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 698GB free Firmware: JP3OA3BF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	68.9% Good	Read 120 Write 120 Mixed 123 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.44 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 20,667 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13.2 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	112x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	4x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	34x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	20x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $269

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16